<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPlayer pushes unlimited usage to the limit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.broadband-finder.co.uk/blog/2008/03/10/iplayer-pushes-unlimited-usage-to-the-limit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.broadband-finder.co.uk/blog/2008/03/10/iplayer-pushes-unlimited-usage-to-the-limit/</link>
	<description>Informed opinions on the state of play in the UK Broadband market</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 23:21:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: now then now then</title>
		<link>http://www.broadband-finder.co.uk/blog/2008/03/10/iplayer-pushes-unlimited-usage-to-the-limit/comment-page-1/#comment-1436</link>
		<dc:creator>now then now then</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broadband-finder.co.uk/blog/2008/03/10/iplayer-pushes-unlimited-usage-to-the-limit/#comment-1436</guid>
		<description>The BBC fluffed it on this one big time. Even though 4oD is mentioend in this article, anyone wonder why there&#039;s been all this fuss about the iPlayer eating up bandwidth and there&#039;s been hardly a whisper about 4oD? Not only is the iPlayer months late, it&#039;s also buggy as hell, bandwitdh hungry, and not to mention a total waste of licence payer&#039;s money. I&#039;m praying for the day when Thompson resigns, and the BBC gets a more competent director.


Not that there&#039;s anything worth catching up on at the moment on the Beeb. All the good stuff is on Dave!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BBC fluffed it on this one big time. Even though 4oD is mentioend in this article, anyone wonder why there&#8217;s been all this fuss about the iPlayer eating up bandwidth and there&#8217;s been hardly a whisper about 4oD? Not only is the iPlayer months late, it&#8217;s also buggy as hell, bandwitdh hungry, and not to mention a total waste of licence payer&#8217;s money. I&#8217;m praying for the day when Thompson resigns, and the BBC gets a more competent director.</p>
<p>Not that there&#8217;s anything worth catching up on at the moment on the Beeb. All the good stuff is on Dave!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fanta</title>
		<link>http://www.broadband-finder.co.uk/blog/2008/03/10/iplayer-pushes-unlimited-usage-to-the-limit/comment-page-1/#comment-1435</link>
		<dc:creator>fanta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broadband-finder.co.uk/blog/2008/03/10/iplayer-pushes-unlimited-usage-to-the-limit/#comment-1435</guid>
		<description>This is one of the big arguments against net neutrality ... large ISPs are saying &quot;hey, everyone&#039;s getting a free ride watching TV, and consumers and the BBC don&#039;t have to pay for it&quot;. When you consider how much people *are* paying their ISPs, and in turn how much the ISP is paying BT Wholesale, not to mention the bandwidth costs the BBC have to pay, there&#039;s only one company getting a free ride ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the big arguments against net neutrality &#8230; large ISPs are saying &#8220;hey, everyone&#8217;s getting a free ride watching TV, and consumers and the BBC don&#8217;t have to pay for it&#8221;. When you consider how much people *are* paying their ISPs, and in turn how much the ISP is paying BT Wholesale, not to mention the bandwidth costs the BBC have to pay, there&#8217;s only one company getting a free ride &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

